Compare the Federalist and Democratic philosophies of government Essay

Compare the Federalist and Democratic philosophies of government - Essay ExampleWith the start of the new government under the Constitution, President George Washington made his creator aide de camp, black lovage Hamilton, United States Secretary of the Treasury. Hamilton was immediately tasked with coming up with a plan to restore public credit. Hamilton proposed the fairly ambitious Hamiltonian economic course of instruction and organized alliances to get these measures passed through the Congress. The measures he proposed were far from universally popular. In particular, they were well liked by the commercial North, and were heartily disliked by the agricultural South. This spurred James Madison, Hamiltons ally in the fight to establish the United States Constitution, to join with Thomas Jefferson in opposing Hamiltons program.The Democratic Party evolved from the governmental factions that opposed Alexander Hamiltons fiscal policies in the early 1790s these factions are know n variously as the Anti-Administration Party or the Anti-Federalists. In the mid-1790s, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison organized these factions into a party and helped define its ideology in favor of yeomen farmers, strict construction of the Constitution, and a weaker federal government. ... The new party was especially effective in construction a network of newspapers in major cities to broadcast its statements and editorialize in its favor.By 1790 or 1791, coalitions were forming in Congress for and against the Hamiltonian program. These were nameless, shifting ad-hoc factions, not permanent political parties. By 1792 or 1793 newspapers started calling Hamilton supporters Federalists and the opponents Republicans.In 1791, Jefferson and Madison travelled widely looking for alliances with factions and parties at the state level. They had support from the short-lived Democratic-Republican Societies. Their major success came in New York, where long-term governor George Clinton, a nd ambitious newcomer Aaron Burr, signed up, as Hamilton was the son-in-law of General Schuyler, one of Clintons enemies. Hamilton likewise realized the need for support in the states he formed connections with local factions, and used his network of Treasury agents to link together friends of the government, especially businessmen and financiers in the new nations dozen small cities (Schlisinger 1992).The state networks of two parties began to operate in 1794 or 1795, thus firmly establishing what has been called The First Party System in all the states. Patronage now became a factor. The winner-take-all election dodge opened a wide gap between winners, who got all the patronage, and losers who got none. Hamilton had over 2000 Treasury jobs to dispense, while Jefferson had one part-time job in the State Department, which he gave to journalist Philip Freneau Madison had none. In New York, however, Clinton used dubious methods to win the election for governor and used the vast