Criticism of Philosophers

There ar legion(predicate) immense philosophers who micturate had slicey great ideas over the centuries. These philosophers have had their ideas passed d admit to many people with the centuries, decades, and years. Fredric Nietzsche, Rene Decartes, and Socrates are philosophers that many philosophy students study. However, not everybody likes or agrees with these philosophers philosophies. The purpose of this paper is to provide information about the cardinal philosophers lives, work, and philosophies. Also, in this paper there go out be criticism of each of the philosophers.Lets begin with a discussion of Socrates. Socrates was a Grecian philosopher who taught an some other Greek philosopher named Plato. Even though Socrates is apprehension to be a great Greek philosopher, we have none of his writings. Therefore, many Greek scholars are not reliable whether what is on the page is what Socrates taught Plato or Platos own thoughts. Socrates background is interesting, just now lets talk about some of Socrates philosophic views. Derek Johnston claims that Socrates thought that there was much good in the world heretofore he believed that virtue was the ultimate good.Johnston goes on to claim that Socrates firmly believed that no outside offset could deprive people of virtue (Johnston, 2006, 11). In short, Socrates was largely concerned with the branch of philosophy called ethics. Socrates alike firmly believed that the quest for experience was the most important thing and by obtaining fellowship about things is the plainly way people become truly virtuous. Johnston also claims that Socrates was also attempting to hazard the neat meaning of ethical words such as true, good, and beautiful using the interrogative sentence and answer method of inquiry.He also held firm that Socrates main belief was that knowledge equals virtue which can and is obtained through reason. In fact, Socrates held strongly that any opinion that someone had that wasnt base on reason should be discarded (Johnston, 2006, 11). Rene Descartes philosophy counted to be establish on doubt and certainty. Decartes began to build his philosophical stance by doubting everything that could be doubted. But, even Decartes believed that there were things that couldnt be called into question.The things that Decartes believed couldnt be called into question were his existence and the existence of God. Decartes believed that his existence couldnt be doubted because he was sitting down thinking about whether or not he existed, among other things. Therefore, he believed that if he doubted things then, he must exist. In other words, Decartes believed he thought therefore he was. He more splendidly put it as I think therefore I am. The Latin for this saying is Cogito Ergo Sum (Johnston, 2006, 76).This argument is sometimes obviously cognize as Cogito. Decartes also was a rationalist. Rationalists believe that there are things that have to be true and that there are things that have to be false. He also believed in the existence of God. His argument for the existence of God essentially says that imperfect beings, which are humans, depend on their existence two stem and continuing upon a perfect being which is God. In addition, according to Johnston, Decartes believed that minds are separate things from bodies (Johnston, 2006, 77). both(prenominal) Socrates and Friedrich Nietzsche had a philosophical view that was based on ethics. Nietzsche was prominent on honorableity. He wished to locate a materialistic basis for his honorable principles. At the beginning of his ethics, he believed that both good and evil were simply ways of illustrating that some actions were good for society and other actions were bad and didnt benefit society. But, later he thought of good and evil in absolute teams (Johnston, 2006, 142). Nietzsche attacks philosophy from an ethical standpoint besides, he promoted only devil sets of ethical determine.One ethic al value was pride in oneself and ruthlessness and philosophy, music, and poetry. Nietzsche thought there were some good ethical qualities that human beings could achieve however he believed that all human beings could strive to get the good object lesson qualities but only a some exceptional human beings could in reality get those good virtuous qualities. According to Johnston, Nietzsches noble man testament have a cruel pass on and will move over his fellow men. In addition, his noble man will be both disciplined and cunning in war (Johnston, 2006, 145).Nietzsches greatest philosophical view is called the Will to Power. Nietzsches Will to Power is the ultimate source of both what is and what will be for human beings. Strong people will be able to get the will to power and weaker people will not be able to get the will to power. According to Johnston, Nietzsches will to power allows peoples current moral judgments and values which are the moral judgments and values of societ y to be washed by forever. Then, and only, then can a new set of pure moral values and judgments emerge (Johnston, 2006, 147).In addition, a hero for Nietzsche is a man who rises supra and beyond his fellow humans by the strength and will of his own powers be them physical or mental or both. His hero will never be sorry for his superiority in fact he should relish and rejoice in it. Compare and Contrast It may seem as if because Socrates, Rene Decartes, and Fredric Nietzsche were born and lived at disparate times and in different centuries that none of these three philosophers philosophical views would have similarities to them. However, there are similarities to these three philosophers philosophies.Rest assured that there are differences in these three philosophers philosophies, but commencement ceremony lets focus on the similarities of these three philosophers philosophical viewpoints. Both Socrates and Fredric Nietzsche subscribe to the school of philosophy called ethics. In fact, according to Johnston, Socrates view of heart centered mostly on ethics and ethical concerns (Johnston, 2006, 11). Also, both Socrates and Nietzsche tried to find the real meaning of ethical terms such as good, trust, bad, and beautiful by means of asking questions and getting answers.In fact, Socrates used the question and answer method to inquire into many moral definitions and many moral issues such as arbitrator. Nowhere is this question and answer method of philosophical inquiry more apparent than in Platos dialogue called The Republic. In Platos dialogue The Republic through Socrates Plato explored both the definition of justice and the concept of justice itself. Plato also talked about what philosophy is and the many types of judicature that is used to run a state. Plato even talked about what he believed was the trounce form of government.Both Socrates and Nietzsche believed that there was one thing that would make people virtuous. Socrates believed that possessi ng knowledge and Nietzsche believed that having the strength of will was the ultimate virtue. In addition, both Socrates and Nietzsche also believed that few people will ever achieve either virtue. These are the only similarities between the three philosophers Descartes, Socrates, and Nietzsche. These three philosophers had more differences between them than similarities. Lets look at thee differences between them now.